When requesting a quote for a car insurance policy you generally have the choice between insuring your vehicle for its market value or for an agreed value should it be written off or stolen. There are pros and cons to both types of cover, so you will need to weigh these up carefully to work out what’s going to work best for you before making a decision.
Difference between market value and agreed value
‘Market value’ is a recognised insurance industry term for what your car would fetch on the open market at the time of making a claim. It is determined by your insurer based on a number of factors and is not the trade-in value, nor what a particular purchaser, such as a collector, would pay for your car. It is also not the cost of replacing your existing car with a brand new one.
So if you insure your car for market value, the price you will receive from the insurer in the event that your car is written off or stolen will be the price that your insurer estimates your car was worth just before the accident or theft. When estimating the market value of your car, your insurer will take into account a range of factors, including the condition, age, make and model of the vehicle, how many kilometres it has travelled, and its service and accident history.
Here is a quick rundown of market value:
‘Agreed value’ is a sum that has been fixed after discussion and agreement between you and your insurer when you take out or renew a policy. An agreed value car insurance policy generally has higher car insurance premiums as the agreed value for your car is usually higher than what it would sell for on the open market (market value).
Here is a quick rundown of agreed value car insurance:
How does my car insurance value affect a claim?
If your car is written off or stolen, the difference between agreed value and market value car insurance becomes apparent.
For example, let’s say you bought a new car for $30,000 and insured it for the agreed value of what you paid for it. If your car was written off soon after, your insurer would pay you the agreed amount of $30,000.
If you insured the same car for market value under the same scenario, the insurer would likely pay less than the purchase price of $30,000. The reason for this is that depreciation (the rate at which your car loses value over time) kicks in as soon as you purchase the car, and gets to work quickly. Your car is subsequently worth less and less as it ages, meaning that the amount your car is insured for under a market value agreement also reduces every day.
Is market value or agreed value car insurance better?
Deciding between agreed value or market value car insurance may boil down to two things: the car you drive and how much you want to spend on premiums. If your car is reasonably modern or has custom modifications and you would like to have enough to replace it in the event of an accident, you might choose to take out an agreed value policy. However, if your car is closer to retirement age or has lower value, you may decide that you would rather pay less in premiums in return for a lower payout should the car be written off, and opt for market value coverage.
Ultimately, there is no one right answer when it comes to deciding between agreed value and market value car insurance. It’s important to weigh up the benefits and drawbacks of each type of cover and what would work best for your individual circumstances before making a decision.
Compare car insurance
In the market for a new car insurance policy? It is a good idea to compare your options when looking for a policy that best suits your needs and budget.
If you’re considering car insurance policies, the comparison table below displays some of the policies currently available on Canstar’s database for a 30-39 year old male seeking cover in NSW without cover for an extra driver under 25. Please note the table is sorted by Star Rating (highest to lowest) followed by provider name (alphabetical) and features links direct to the providers’ website. Use Canstar’s car insurance comparison selector to view a wider range of policies.
Original article published by Dominic Beattie on 21 May 2018